Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Dorsum and hump · Open versus closed approach · 2013
Dorsal augmentation with diced cartilage enclosed with temporal fascia in secondary endonasal rhinoplasty
Harel M, Margulis A.
What this paper says
In 18 revision patients whose bridge was rebuilt through nostril incisions with diced cartilage packed in a tube of temple fascia, the bridge was smooth in all, no cartilage resorbed over at least 15 months, and 1 patient needed a revision for a contour irregularity.
Overview
Diced cartilage wrapped in fascia is an established way to build up the bridge in open rhinoplasty, but no data existed for placing it through the closed approach. The authors describe forming the graft as a sealed fascia cylinder and sliding it into a dorsal pocket through nostril incisions in revision cases.
Sections of note
- Retrospective review of 18 closed secondary rhinoplasties, 2008 to 2011; mean age 32.
- Cartilage from septum, rib or ear diced into 0.5 to 1 mm cubes.
- Deep temporal fascia, about 5 by 5 cm, harvested through a single V-shaped incision over the temple, wrapped around a 1 mL syringe, filled with diced cartilage and sutured closed at both ends.
- Graft placed on the dorsum via the endonasal approach.
- Cartilage source: ear in 8, septum plus ear in 6, rib in 4.
- Minimum follow-up 15 months.
- Complications in 3 patients; 1 required surgical revision for contour irregularity.
- No cartilage resorption; smooth dorsal continuity in all patients.
What it means for a patient
- A scooped or uneven bridge from a previous operation can be rebuilt without an external incision, using the patient's own cartilage and fascia.
- In this small series the graft held its volume for over a year.
- Only 18 patients and the authors themselves call the numbers insufficient for firm conclusions; the two non-revised complications are not described.
Why this paper matters
It extends the diced cartilage in fascia technique to closed rhinoplasty, where graft fixation is harder. Larger series and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the absence of resorption.
Terms
- Diced cartilage: cartilage cut into tiny cubes so it can be molded.
- Deep temporal fascia: the tough layer over the temple muscle, used as a wrap for diced cartilage.
- Endonasal approach: rhinoplasty through incisions hidden inside the nostrils.
- Dorsal augmentation: raising the height of the nasal bridge.
- Concha: the bowl-shaped cartilage of the outer ear, a graft source.
- Resorption: the body breaking down and absorbing a graft, causing it to shrink.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows. All 1,262 summaries.
From the abstract
“Placement of diced cartilage enclosed within an autologous fascia sleeve (DC-F) for nasal dorsum reconstruction is common in open rhinoplasty, but there are no data regarding its use in closed rhinoplasty (the endonasal approach). Objectives: The authors describe a technique for augmenting the nasal dorsum in…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Revision and secondary rhinoplasty
Between 5% and 15% of rhinoplasties are done again, and the published series say the second operation is a different problem from the first: the cartilage is gone, the skin is scarred and less able to survive, and the airway is usually part of the complaint.
Rib, ear and septal grafts
Modern rhinoplasty builds rather than removes, so the operation runs on cartilage: the septum first, then the ear, then the rib, and when none of those will do, a piece of donated rib from a tissue bank.
Dorsum and hump
The hump is the commonest reason people ask for rhinoplasty and the step that decides most of what follows: take the roof off and the middle vault has to be rebuilt, keep the roof and it may push its way back up.
Open versus closed approach
Whether the surgeon opens the nose through a small incision across the columella or works entirely through the nostrils has been argued in print since 1973, was put on facing pages of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery by Jack Gunter and Jack Sheen in 1997, and was finally pooled in 2025: across twenty studies and 1,067 patients there is no significant difference in what patients report, in breathing, in complications or in swelling.
Related papers
Same topic, 2013.
- ASJ Cosmetic rhinoplasty: revision rates revisitedNeaman KC, Boettcher AK, Do VH et al.2013PMID 23277618Summary
- ASJ Secondary Asian rhinoplasty: lengthening the short noseKim SK, Kim HS2013PMID 23395883Summary
- APS Comparison of the effects of columellar strut and septal extension grafts for tip support in rhinoplastyAkkus AM, Eryilmaz E, Guneren E2013PMID 23708246Summary
- APS The use of short spreader grafts in rhinoplasty for patients with thick nasal skinGrigoryants V, Baroni A2013PMID 23519873Summary
- APS Use of osseocartilaginous paste graft for refinement of the nasal dorsum in rhinoplastyOrak F, Baghaki S2013PMID 23860817Summary
- COOH 2013PMID 23842290Abstract
- FPS Alar-spanning suture for tip contouring in closed approach rhinoplasty for African-Caucasian nosesCedin AC2013PMID 23761120Summary
- FPS Rhinoplasty using autologous costal cartilageMiranda N, Larocca CG, Aponte C2013PMID 23761122Summary