Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · 2014
Characterization of postoperative changes in nasal airflow using a cadaveric computational fluid dynamics model: supporting the internal nasal valve
Shadfar S, Shockley WW, Fleischman GM, Dugar AR, McKinney KA, Frank-Ito DO, Kimbell JS.
In the archive as a landmark paper: the core sweep runs 2011–2026, and this one is here because the history of rhinoplasty rests on it · cited on spreader grafts.
Abstract
Importance: Collapse or compromise of the internal nasal valve (INV) results in symptomatic nasal obstruction; thus, various surgical maneuvers are designed to support the INV.
Objective: To determine the effect on nasal airflow after various surgical techniques focused at the level of the INV and lateral nasal sidewall.
Design And Setting: A fresh cadaver head was obtained and underwent suture and cartilage graft techniques directed at the level of the INV using an external approach. Preoperative and postoperative digital nasal models were created from the high-resolution, fine-cut, computed tomographic imaging after each intervention. Isolating the interventions to the level of the INV, we used computational fluid dynamic techniques to calculate nasal resistance, nasal airflow, and nasal airflow partitioning for each intervention.
Intervention: Suture and cartilage graft techniques.
Main Outcomes And Measures: Nasal airflow, nasal resistance, and partitioning of airflow.
Results: Using the soft-tissue elevation model as baseline, computational fluid dynamic analysis predicted that most of the suture and cartilage graft techniques directed toward the nasal valve improved nasal airflow and partitioning while reducing nasal resistance. Specifically, medial and modified flare suture techniques alone improved nasal airflow by 16.9% and 15.1%, respectively. The combination of spreader grafts and modified flare suture improved nasal airflow by 13.2%, whereas spreader grafts alone only improved airflow by 5.9%. The largest improvements in bilateral nasal resistance were achieved using the medial and modified flare sutures, outperforming the combination of spreader grafts and modified flare suture.
Conclusions And Relevance: Techniques directed at supporting the INV have tremendous value in the treatment of nasal obstruction. The use of flare sutures alone can address dynamic valve collapse or upper lateral cartilage incompetence without gross disruption of the nasal architecture. Using computational fluid dynamic techniques, this study suggests that flare sutures alone may improve flow and reduce resistance when placed medially, surpassing spreader grafts alone or in combination with flare sutures. The longevity of these maneuvers can only be assessed in the clinical setting. Studies in additional specimens and clinical correlation in human subjects deserve further attention and investigation.
Level Of Evidence: NA.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, same years.
- JAMA FPS Treatment outcomes of extracorporeal septoplasty compared with in situ septal correction in rhinoplastyLee SB, Jang YJ2014PMID 25079613Summary
- PRS Simplifying the management of caudal septal deviation in rhinoplastyConstantine FC, Ahmad J, Geissler P et al.2014PMID 24569427Summary
- APS Evaluating current functional airway surgery during rhinoplasty: a survey of the American Society of Plastic SurgeonsAfifi AM, Kempton SJ, Gordon CR et al.2015PMID 25631786Summary
- JAMA FPS Reconstruction of the Nasoseptal L-Strut in RhinoplastyKim DW, Attenello NH2015PMID 26432958
- OHNS Anterior Septal Reconstruction for Treatment of Severe Caudal Septal Deviation: Clinical Severity and OutcomesSurowitz J, Lee MK, Most SP2015PMID 25883105Abstract
- PRS 2015PMID 25811570Summary
- PRS Closed Microfracture Technique for Surgical Correction of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy in Rhinoplasty: Safety and Technical ConsiderationsRohrich RJ, McKee D, Malafa M2015PMID 26505717Summary
- PRS Reply: simplifying the management of caudal septal deviation in rhinoplastyConstantine FC, Ahmad J, Geissler P et al.2015PMID 25742526