Journal archive · Nasal tip · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · Open versus closed approach · 2016
Columellar Incision Scars in Asian Patients Undergoing Open Rhinoplasty
Kim HC, Jang YJ.
What this paper says
Among 234 Asian open rhinoplasty patients followed at least six months, 14 (6.0 percent) had a problematic scar at the columellar incision, and redness settled after a mean 66.7 days.
Overview
Open rhinoplasty gives wide, undistorted access to the nasal framework, and its main drawback is a visible scar across the columella. The authors reviewed 529 patients operated at a tertiary centre in South Korea between January 2011 and May 2014 to establish how often problem scars occur, how they evolve and what makes them more likely.
Sections of note
- 529 patients, 176 female and 353 male, mean age 31, range 5 to 70.
- 234 patients with at least six months of follow-up were evaluated for problem scarring.
- 14 of 234 (6.0 percent) had a problematic scar: wide and depressed 4 (1.7 percent), notching 3 (1.3 percent), hyperpigmentation 4 (1.7 percent), hypertrophic scar at the marginal incision 2 (0.8 percent), and skin necrosis of the columella 1 (0.4 percent).
- Among 243 patients evaluated for redness, almost all had red wounds immediately after surgery.
- Redness normalised after a mean of 66.7 days, standard deviation 37.4.
- Using rib cartilage as tip graft material was associated with problem scarring: 2 of 25 patients (8.0 percent) against 6 of 180 (3.3 percent) with other graft material, p = 0.02. Level of evidence 4.
What it means for a patient
- The scar under the nose is red for roughly two months on average before settling.
- Six in a hundred patients had a scar problem, most commonly a widened, depressed or darkened line.
- One patient in the series lost skin at the columella, which is the most serious of the outcomes recorded.
- Retrospective, single centre, and fewer than half the operated patients had enough follow-up to be assessed, which may bias the rate in either direction.
Why this paper matters
The columellar scar is the standing objection to the open approach and is often discussed without data. Putting a rate on it in a specific population, and identifying rib cartilage grafting as a risk factor, gives the consent conversation numbers. The authors conclude the low rate is not a reason to avoid open rhinoplasty.
Terms
- Columella: the strip of skin between the two nostrils.
- Transcolumellar incision: the small cut across that strip used in open rhinoplasty.
- Hyperpigmentation: darkening of the skin at a scar.
- Hypertrophic scar: a raised, thickened scar.
- Necrosis: death of tissue from loss of blood supply.
- Erythema: redness of the skin.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows. All 1,262 summaries.
From the abstract
“An open approach has been adopted for rhinoplasty because of its wide and undistorted exposure. The formation of a columellar incision scar is the main drawback of this approach. Objective: To evaluate the incidence and evolution of and risk factors for columellar incision scars in an Asian population. Design,…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Nasal tip
Tip surgery is now a support problem rather than a sculpting problem: the septal extension graft holds projection and rotation where the columellar strut loses them (0.2% against 4.7% projection loss at one year), and the current series repair, reposition and reinforce the lower lateral cartilages instead of excising them.
Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty
The nose in front of the surgeon decides the operation, not the patient's ancestry: skin thickness, cartilage strength and existing dorsal height set the limits of what any technique can deliver, and planning every nose toward one Caucasian ideal is the error the comparative data now names.
Open versus closed approach
Whether the surgeon opens the nose through a small incision across the columella or works entirely through the nostrils has been argued in print since 1973, was put on facing pages of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery by Jack Gunter and Jack Sheen in 1997, and was finally pooled in 2025: across twenty studies and 1,067 patients there is no significant difference in what patients report, in breathing, in complications or in swelling.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- ASJ Anatomical Study of the Lateral Crural Strut Graft in Rhinoplasty and Its Clinical ApplicationSilva Filho Rde O, Pochat VD2016PMID 27277274Summary
- ASJ 2016PMID 27535924
- ASJ 2016PMID 27095313Full text
- ASJ Efficacy and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid Filler to Correct Aesthetically Detracting or Deficient Features of the Asian Nose: A Prospective, Open-Label, Long-Term StudyLiew S, Scamp T, de Maio M et al.2016PMID 27301371Full text
- ASJ Microautologous Fat Transplantation for Primary Augmentation Rhinoplasty: Long-Term Monitoring of 198 Asian PatientsKao WP, Lin YN, Lin TY et al.2016PMID 26764261Summary
- ASJ Preventing Elevated Radix Deformity in Asian Rhinoplasty with a Chimeric Dorsal-Glabellar ConstructZelken JA, Hong JP, Broyles JM et al.2016PMID 26879296Summary
- APS Diced Cartilage in Fascia for Major Nasal Dorsal Augmentation in Asians: A Review of 15 Consecutive CasesPark P, Jin HR2016PMID 27752742Abstract
- APS Rapid Resorbable Sutures Are a Favourable Alternative to Non-resorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in RhinoplastyAlinasab B, Haraldsson PO2016PMID 27251749Summary