Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Anatomy and nasal analysis · Adolescent and aging nose · History, education and training · 2016
Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging and the Continuous Evolution of Preoperative and Postoperative Assessment in Rhinoplasty
Lekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton GS 3rd, Hellings PW.
What this paper says
A review of three-dimensional surface imaging in rhinoplasty, covering its use in showing patients the plan before surgery and in measuring shape and volume change afterwards.
Overview
The standard rhinoplasty consultation involves history, examination of both breathing and appearance, establishing what the patient wants, facial analysis from standardised photographs, and a discussion of goals and pitfalls. Two-dimensional computer morphing added to that over the previous decade. The authors review what three-dimensional surface imaging has changed, and where the field is heading.
Sections of note
- The article is a literature review, not a study of patients.
- Morphing of preoperative photographs is described as an evolution of the consultation that drew considerable interest in the previous decade.
- Three-dimensional imaging is stated to have changed how surgeons manage patients before surgery and evaluate results afterwards.
- Three stated uses: communicating with the patient before surgery, setting a surgical plan, and measuring shape and volume change resulting from the operation.
- The review analyses current knowledge derived from the published literature.
- Future directions in preoperative and postoperative assessment are highlighted. No patient numbers, accuracy figures or outcome data appear in the abstract.
What it means for a patient
- Simulated images shown at consultation are a communication tool, not a promise of the result.
- Three-dimensional capture allows actual measurement of how much a nose changed, which flat photographs cannot do reliably.
- Measuring volume change is what makes it possible to check whether grafts or fillers held their size over time.
- A narrative review with no data cannot say how accurately these simulations predict real results.
Why this paper matters
Rhinoplasty outcome research has been limited by measuring three-dimensional changes from two-dimensional photographs. Surface imaging removes that constraint and also raises the question of what a simulation shown at consultation implies. How closely simulations match outcomes, and how that affects satisfaction, remains open.
Terms
- Three-dimensional surface imaging: capturing the shape of the face as a measurable digital surface.
- Morphing: digitally altering a photograph to show an intended result.
- Standardised photography: photographs taken in fixed positions and lighting so they can be compared.
- Facial analysis: systematic assessment of facial proportions and landmarks.
- Preoperative assessment: evaluation before surgery, covering examination, goals and planning.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows. All 1,262 summaries.
From the abstract
“During the preoperative assessment in rhinoplasty, the surgeon takes a thorough history, performs a complete examination by assessing functional and aesthetic aspects of the nose, obtains a clear understanding of the patient's wishes, conducts facial analysis based on standardized photography, and communicates to the…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Revision and secondary rhinoplasty
Between 5% and 15% of rhinoplasties are done again, and the published series say the second operation is a different problem from the first: the cartilage is gone, the skin is scarred and less able to survive, and the airway is usually part of the complaint.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
Before any technique is chosen, the nose has to be read: the bone measured, the cartilage counted, the skin assessed, and the result the patient wants agreed on a photograph that is not yet true.
Adolescent and aging nose
The same operation is a different problem at twelve and at seventy: in a child the fear is stunting a nose that has not finished growing, and in an older patient the nose has kept changing, dropping at the tip, thinning at the skin and weakening at the cartilage, until it blocks the airway.
History, education and training
Rhinoplasty is the oldest operation in plastic surgery and one of the hardest to teach: the technique reaches a trainee through a fellowship year, a meeting, a video and, increasingly, a printed model, because the traditional apprenticeship gives most residents almost no hands-on time.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- ASJ Anatomical Study of the Lateral Crural Strut Graft in Rhinoplasty and Its Clinical ApplicationSilva Filho Rde O, Pochat VD2016PMID 27277274Summary
- ASJ 2016PMID 27535924
- ASJ Efficacy and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid Filler to Correct Aesthetically Detracting or Deficient Features of the Asian Nose: A Prospective, Open-Label, Long-Term StudyLiew S, Scamp T, de Maio M et al.2016PMID 27301371Full text
- ASJ Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media AnalysisKhansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD2016PMID 26063834Summary
- ASJ Perioperative Corticosteroids Reduce Short-Term Edema and Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-AnalysisCoroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Cook DJ et al.2016PMID 26773090Summary
- APS 2016PMID 27369840Abstract
- APS Safe Planes for Injection Rhinoplasty: A Histological Analysis of Midline Longitudinal Sections of the Asian NoseTansatit T, Moon HJ, Rungsawang C et al.2016PMID 26893278Summary
- CPS 2016PMID 26616707Summary