Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · 2016
Histology and Long-term Stability of Diced Cartilage Graft for Revision Rhinoplasty in a Cleft Patient
Lin SI, Hsiao YC, Chang CS, Chen PK, Chen JP, Ueng SH.
What this paper says
Two pieces of diced cartilage removed from a cleft patient's nose four and a half years after placement were examined under the microscope and found to be living, mature cartilage.
Overview
Diced cartilage is usually wrapped in Surgicel or fascia before it is placed, and pure diced cartilage without any wrapping is less often reported, because of concerns that the pieces scatter, can be felt, or show through the skin. This case report presents what such a graft looked like microscopically after four and a half years in place.
Sections of note
- Case report of one cleft rhinoplasty patient.
- Two pieces of a pure diced cartilage graft placed four and a half years earlier were removed during a revision procedure and sent for microscopic analysis.
- The examination showed small blocks of mature hyaline cartilage embedded in dense fibrous connective tissue.
- Small blood vessel channels were widely scattered through that tissue.
- The cartilage was alive, with chondrocytes present in their lacunae.
- The authors conclude the graft was viable and stable at four and a half years and suggest pure diced cartilage can reliably augment the nasal bridge in cleft rhinoplasty. Advantages and disadvantages of the technique are discussed.
What it means for a patient
- The graft was still living cartilage rather than scar tissue, which is the mechanism by which added height is expected to last.
- The tissue between the pieces had become dense fibrous tissue with a blood supply, which is what appears to hold the pieces together without a wrapping.
- Concerns about scattering, palpability and visibility are the stated reason it is used less often, and this report does not measure how often they occur.
- A single specimen from a single patient at one time point. It shows what happened in one case, not what typically happens.
Why this paper matters
Diced cartilage is widely used but rarely examined after years in place, since doing so requires a revision operation and a willing patient. Direct histological evidence of survival at four and a half years is unusual. Whether the graft held its volume, and how it behaves without a wrapping in general, remains unanswered.
Terms
- Diced cartilage graft: cartilage chopped into small pieces so it moulds smoothly beneath the skin.
- Histology: examination of tissue structure under a microscope.
- Hyaline cartilage: the smooth type of cartilage found in the nose and joints.
- Chondrocyte: a living cartilage cell.
- Surgicel: an absorbable surgical gauze sometimes used to wrap diced cartilage.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows. All 1,262 summaries.
Abstract
Diced cartilage graft wrapped in Surgicel or fascia has been widely reported in the literature. Pure diced cartilage graft without the use of a "sleeve," on the contrary, is not as commonly reported. This could be due to concerns of graft dispersion, palpability, or visibility. In this case report, histologic findings of a pure diced cartilage graft placed 4½ years ago are reported. In addition, advantages and disadvantages of this technique are discussed in detail. Two pieces of the diced cartilage graft placed 4½ years prior were excised and sent for histologic analysis during a revision procedure. The microscopic examination reveals several small blocks of mature hyaline cartilage embedded in dense fibrous connective tissue with widely scattered small vascular channels. The cartilage is vital with scattered chondrocytes within their lacunae. Histology of the diced cartilage graft demonstrated viability and stability of the graft 4½ years after insertion. This case report also suggests that pure diced cartilage graft can provide reliable volume augmentation of nasal dorsum in cleft rhinoplasty.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Revision and secondary rhinoplasty
Between 5% and 15% of rhinoplasties are done again, and the published series say the second operation is a different problem from the first: the cartilage is gone, the skin is scarred and less able to survive, and the airway is usually part of the complaint.
Rib, ear and septal grafts
Modern rhinoplasty builds rather than removes, so the operation runs on cartilage: the septum first, then the ear, then the rib, and when none of those will do, a piece of donated rib from a tissue bank.
Cleft, trauma and reconstruction
A cleft nose is a sequence spread across a childhood: a repair at three months, sometimes a second at five or six, and a definitive rhinoplasty once the face has finished growing.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- ASJ Anatomical Study of the Lateral Crural Strut Graft in Rhinoplasty and Its Clinical ApplicationSilva Filho Rde O, Pochat VD2016PMID 27277274Summary
- ASJ 2016PMID 27535924
- ASJ 2016PMID 27095313Full text
- ASJ Microautologous Fat Transplantation for Primary Augmentation Rhinoplasty: Long-Term Monitoring of 198 Asian PatientsKao WP, Lin YN, Lin TY et al.2016PMID 26764261Summary
- APS Diced Cartilage in Fascia for Major Nasal Dorsal Augmentation in Asians: A Review of 15 Consecutive CasesPark P, Jin HR2016PMID 27752742Abstract
- CPS 2016PMID 26616708Summary
- CPS 2016PMID 26616707Summary
- CPS Revision RhinoplastyLoyo M, Wang TD2016PMID 26616705Summary