Journal archive · Nasal tip · Open versus closed approach · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2017
Columellar Scar Perception in Open Rhinoplasty. Interplay of Scar Awareness, Body Cathexis and Patient Satisfaction
Yağmur Ç, Ak S, Engin MS, Evin N, Kelahmetoğlu O, Akbaş H, Demir A.
What this paper says
Among 91 open rhinoplasty patients, only 12 spontaneously reported the scar between their nostrils, and awareness of it was linked to lower body satisfaction scores rather than to dissatisfaction with the operation.
Overview
Open rhinoplasty leaves a small scar across the strip of skin between the nostrils, and this is routinely cited as the approach's main drawback. The authors tested how many patients actually notice it and whether noticing it affects how satisfied they are with their nose or how they feel about their body generally.
Sections of note
- 91 patients who had undergone open rhinoplasty were included.
- A written questionnaire of 4 sequential questions was used; the first asked whether the patient had any facial scar from trauma, surgery, or another cause, and the rest were scored 1 to 5.
- Two instruments were applied: the 25-question Modified Body Cathexis Scale and the Columellar Scar Assessment Scale.
- 12 of 91 answered yes to the first question by reporting their columellar scar.
- Patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between those who reported the scar and those who did not, p greater than 0.05.
- Those who reported the scar had significantly lower Modified Body Cathexis Scale scores.
- 9 patients said they made an effort to conceal their scars, and satisfaction differed significantly between concealers and non-concealers.
- Scar assessment scores were significantly higher in those who reported the scar. Level of evidence IV.
What it means for a patient
- Most patients in this group did not name the columellar scar when asked openly about facial scars.
- Noticing the scar tracked with a person's broader feelings about their body rather than with regret about the surgery.
- Those actively hiding the scar were a distinct group whose satisfaction did differ.
- Limits: 91 patients, one center, questionnaire based, no comparison with closed rhinoplasty patients, and no stated time since surgery.
Why this paper matters
The columellar scar is the standard argument against the open approach, and this measures how much patients actually register it. It shifts the question from scar quality toward how a person relates to their own body.
Terms
- Columella: The strip of skin between the nostrils, where the open rhinoplasty incision is placed.
- Body cathexis: How positively or negatively a person feels about their own body.
- Modified Body Cathexis Scale: A 25-question instrument measuring that feeling.
- Columellar Scar Assessment Scale: A grading scale for the appearance of that scar.
- Open rhinoplasty: Surgery using that external incision to expose the framework.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows. All 1,262 summaries.
From the abstract
“Open and closed approaches for rhinoplasty have individual advantages and disadvantages; however, the resultant columellar scar of the open approach is directly considered as a disadvantage. This study focuses on the columellar scar awareness and its implications on overall satisfaction of the patients after open…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Nasal tip
Tip surgery is now a support problem rather than a sculpting problem: the septal extension graft holds projection and rotation where the columellar strut loses them (0.2% against 4.7% projection loss at one year), and the current series repair, reposition and reinforce the lower lateral cartilages instead of excising them.
Open versus closed approach
Whether the surgeon opens the nose through a small incision across the columella or works entirely through the nostrils has been argued in print since 1973, was put on facing pages of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery by Jack Gunter and Jack Sheen in 1997, and was finally pooled in 2025: across twenty studies and 1,067 patients there is no significant difference in what patients report, in breathing, in complications or in swelling.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
Rhinoplasty is measured with ten different questionnaires, none of which covers both the way the nose looks and the way it breathes, and the best-developed one has no airway questions at all.
Related papers
Same topic, 2017.
- ASJ 2017PMID 28364535
- ASJ 2017PMID 28364534Summary
- ASJ Use of the "Septal T" as a Spacer and Conformer for a Properly Contoured Nasal Tip in RhinoplastyRobotti E, Choc IS, Jaber O2017PMID 27277275
- APS Advocating the Use of Absorbable Sutures for Columellar Incisions Following Open RhinoplastyBeegun I, Saleh HA2017PMID 28204928Summary
- APS 2017PMID 28032151Summary
- AJRA A novel technique for the quantitative examination of nasal tip supportAtighechi S, Sajadinejad BS, Farhadi M et al.2017PMID 28234154Abstract
- APS Lateral Crural Reinforcement in Secondary Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity Through a Combined Lateral Crural Turn-over Flap and Strut GraftHan J, Baek RM, Kim BK2017PMID 27845961Abstract
- BJO Effectiveness of caudal septal extension graft application in endonasal septoplastyKaradavut Y, Akyıldız I, Karadaş H et al.2017PMID 27184923Full text