Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Rib, ear and septal grafts · 2017
Injection of Compressed Diced Cartilage in the Correction of Secondary and Primary Rhinoplasty: A New Technique with 12 Years' Experience
Erol OO.
What this paper says
Across 3,182 rhinoplasties over 12 years using a purpose-designed syringe that compresses diced cartilage before injection, graft take was complete in 3,125 patients (98.2 percent), with partial resorption in 0.65 percent and overcorrection in 1.13 percent.
Overview
Diced cartilage can be injected into pockets in the nose without any wrapping material, but the author found results with standard 1-cc syringes partial and incomplete. He designed syringes in two sizes that compress the diced cartilage so it is delivered as one solid mass rather than loose fragments.
Sections of note
- Series of 3,182 rhinoplasties: 2,366 primary, 749 secondary, and 67 cleft lip and nose cases, accrued over 12 years.
- The injected mass is described as a conglutinate mass simulating carved rib cartilage but malleable.
- Complete graft take with a smooth surface in 3,125 patients, 98.2 percent.
- Partial resorption in 21 patients, 0.65 percent, corrected by reinjecting a small amount of diced cartilage.
- Overcorrection in 36 patients, 1.13 percent, treated 1 year later by simple rasping.
- The author states the amount injected is predictable because it is purely cartilage, unlike cartilage wrapped in Surgicel or fascia.
- Claimed advantages over carved cartilage: moldable, time saving, no late show or warping; the injection takes a few minutes.
What it means for a patient
- The graft is placed through a syringe rather than carved and inserted, and can be shaped afterward.
- In this series almost all grafts survived, with under 2 percent needing any touch-up.
- Because the graft contains no wrapping material, the amount placed corresponds directly to the amount of cartilage.
- Limits: a single surgeon's series with no comparison group, no randomization, no stated follow-up length for the whole cohort, and outcomes assessed by the operating surgeon.
Why this paper matters
Diced cartilage wrapped in fascia has been the standard for dorsal augmentation, and this reports very large numbers for an unwrapped injected alternative. The scale is unusual for rhinoplasty. Without a control group the reported take and resorption rates cannot be compared directly with the wrapped technique.
Terms
- Diced cartilage: Cartilage cut into very small pieces and used as a mass rather than a block.
- Graft take: Survival and incorporation of a graft into the surrounding tissue.
- Resorption: Gradual absorption and shrinkage of a graft by the body.
- Warping: Bending of a solid carved cartilage graft after implantation.
- Rasping: Filing down a small excess or irregularity.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows. All 1,262 summaries.
From the abstract
“There are instances where small or large pockets are filled with diced cartilage in the nose, without use of wrapping materials. For this purpose, 1-cc commercial syringes were used. The obtained results were partial and incomplete. For better and improved results, the author designed new syringes, with two different…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Revision and secondary rhinoplasty
Between 5% and 15% of rhinoplasties are done again, and the published series say the second operation is a different problem from the first: the cartilage is gone, the skin is scarred and less able to survive, and the airway is usually part of the complaint.
Rib, ear and septal grafts
Modern rhinoplasty builds rather than removes, so the operation runs on cartilage: the septum first, then the ear, then the rib, and when none of those will do, a piece of donated rib from a tissue bank.
Related papers
Same topic, 2017.
- ASJ 2017PMID 29025221
- ASJ 2017PMID 28364535
- ASJ Incidence and Preoperative Risk Factors for Major Complications in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Analysis of 4978 PatientsLayliev J, Gupta V, Kaoutzanis C et al.2017PMID 28472446Summary
- ASJ 2017PMID 28364534Summary
- APS 2017PMID 28032151Summary
- APS The Versatile Posterior Auricular Fascia in Secondary Rhinoplasty ProceduresHodgkinson DJ, Valente PM2017PMID 28341947Summary
- APS Lateral Crural Reinforcement in Secondary Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity Through a Combined Lateral Crural Turn-over Flap and Strut GraftHan J, Baek RM, Kim BK2017PMID 27845961Abstract
- FPS Auricular Composite Grafting in Functional RhinoplastyRao N, Toriumi DM2017PMID 28753714