rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Complications and management · 2019

JAMA FPS JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery · 2019

Outcomes of Nasal Septal Perforation Repair Using Combined Temporoparietal Fascia Graft and Polydioxanone Plate Construct

Morse J, Harris J, Owen S, Sowder J, Stephan S.

In the archive as a landmark paper: the core sweep runs 2011–2026, and this one is here because the history of rhinoplasty rests on it · cited on septal perforation.

Abstract

Importance: Numerous techniques are used for septal perforation repair, yet success rates remain variable. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft for septal perforation repair.

Objective: To investigate and describe the use of interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft for septal perforation repair and the expansion of this technique to patients with more challenging comorbidities, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A retrospective medical record review was performed of patients who underwent septal perforation repair using interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft from January 1, 2015, to July 1, 2018, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2018, at the University of Iowa.

Intervention: All patients underwent septal perforation repair with interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates and a temporoparietal fascia graft.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Assessing closure of septal perforation was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were resolution of presenting symptoms of septal perforation, area of perforation, length of postoperative stent and silastic sheeting placement, postoperative complications and resolution, and duration of follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores were assessed.

Results: A total of 17 patients (12 women and 5 men; mean [SD] age, 45 [15] years) were included. The causes of perforations were iatrogenic (9 [53%]), rheumatologic (2 [12%]), and unknown or idiopathic (6 [35%]). Patients most commonly presented with nasal crusting (12 [71%]), whistling (9 [53%]), nasal obstruction (9 [53%]), and epistaxis (5 [29%]). Mean (SD) perforation size was 0.99 (1.04) cm2. Mean (SD) postoperative follow-up was 6.1 (4.1) months. A total of 15 patients (88%) had complete resolution of presenting symptoms at last follow-up. All perforations were closed with overlying mucosa at the most recent follow-up examination. Nine of 17 patients completed both preoperative and postoperative NOSE. There was a significant difference between the mean (SD) preoperative and postoperative NOSE scores (62.78 [27.74] vs 17.78 [15.83]; P = .004).

Conclusions And Relevance: Repair of symptomatic nasal septal perforations using a temporoparietal fascia graft combined with a polydioxanone plate was associated with positive outcomes. Repair of septal perforations caused by rheumatologic disease, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis, can be considered for repair using this technique. Resolution of symptoms appeared to be clinically more meaningful in evaluation of septal perforation repair than rate of perforation closure, and the NOSE scale has the potential to serve as an objective corroboration to patient-reported postoperative outcomes.

Level Of Evidence: 4.

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2019
Authors
5
Type
Journal Article, Multicenter Study
Access
Open access
On this site
Full abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2019.

  1. ASJ
    2019PMID 31145779
  2. ASJ
    2019PMID 29340617
  3. ASJ
    2019PMID 30722008Summary
  4. ASJ
    2019PMID 30805636Abstract
  5. APS
    2019PMID 30706084Summary
  6. APS
    2019PMID 31263933Summary
  7. APS
    2019PMID 30607575Summary
  8. APS
    2019PMID 30264272Summary