Journal archive · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2019
Long-Term Nasal Growth after Primary Rhinoplasty for Bilateral Cleft Lip Nose Deformity: A Three-Dimensional Photogrammetric Study with Comparative Analysis
Seo HJ, Denadai R, Lo LJ.
In the archive as a landmark paper: the core sweep runs 2011–2026, and this one is here because the history of rhinoplasty rests on it · cited on cleft lip rhinoplasty.
Abstract
Nasal deformity is associated with congenital cleft lip and palate. Primary rhinoplasty for reconstruction of the nasal deformity at the time of bilateral cleft lip repair is a controversial issue in cleft care due to traditional teaching concerning the potential impairment of nasal growth. This study assessed long-term nasal growth in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent primary rhinoplasty by a single surgeon between 1995 and 2002 and reached skeletal maturity (n = 39; mean: 19 ± 2 years). Normal age-, gender-, and ethnicity-matched subjects (n = 52) were enrolled for comparative analyses. Three-dimensional nasal photogrammetric measurements (10 linear, 4 angular, 6 proportional, 1 surface area, and 1 volume parameter) were collected from patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate and normal subjects. Patients who underwent rhinoplasty presented with significantly (all p < 0.05) smaller nasal tip projection and nasal tip angles, but greater values for nasal dorsum length, nasal protrusion, alar width, columellar height, dome height, columellar angle, labiocolumellar angle, nasal tip height ratio, nasal index, alar width/intercanthal distance ratio, and alar width/mouth width ratio compared to normal subjects. There were no differences (all p > 0.05) in nasal height, tip/midline deviation, nasal dorsum angle, dome-to-columella ratio, columella height/alar width ratio, area surface, and volume parameters between the two groups. This study shows that primary rhinoplasty performed in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate during infancy does not result in deficiency of the nasal dimensions relative to controls.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Cleft, trauma and reconstruction
A cleft nose is a sequence spread across a childhood: a repair at three months, sometimes a second at five or six, and a definitive rhinoplasty once the face has finished growing.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
Before any technique is chosen, the nose has to be read: the bone measured, the cartilage counted, the skin assessed, and the result the patient wants agreed on a photograph that is not yet true.
Related papers
Same topic, 2019.
- ASJ Commentary on: Functional/Aesthetic Measures of Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A ReviewEast C2019PMID 31145779
- ASJ Functional/Aesthetic Measures of Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A ReviewXiao H, Zhao Y, Liu L et al.2019PMID 30722008Summary
- ASJ In-House Manufacture of Sterilizable, Scaled, Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Models for RhinoplastyBekisz JM, Liss HA, Maliha SG et al.2019PMID 29982464Summary
- ASJ Scroll Reconstruction: Fine Tuning of the Interface Between Middle and Lower Thirds in RhinoplastyBitik O, Uzun H, Konaş E2019PMID 29394311Summary
- ASJ 2019PMID 30107387Summary
- APS A Safer Non-surgical Filler Augmentation Rhinoplasty Based on the Anatomy of the NoseJung GS, Chu SG, Lee JW et al.2019PMID 30560283Summary
- APS Aesthetic Rhinoplasty and Nasal Obstruction: Presentation of Results of a 100-Patient Study by Using NOSE InventoryKotzampasakis D, Delistathi T, Kotzampasakis S et al.2019PMID 30706084Summary
- APS Clinical Application of Three-Dimensionally Printed Biomaterial Polycaprolactone (PCL) in Augmentation RhinoplastyPark YJ, Cha JH, Bang SI et al.2019PMID 30498936Summary