Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · 2019
Assessment of bioabsorbable implant treatment for nasal valve collapse compared to a sham group: a randomized control trial
Stolovitzky P, Senior B, Ow RA, Mehendale N, Bikhazi N, Sidle DM.
In the archive as a landmark paper: the core sweep runs 2011–2026, and this one is here because the history of rhinoplasty rests on it · cited on internal nasal valve.
Abstract
Background: Dynamic nasal valve collapse (NVC) is a common factor contributing to nasal obstruction; however, it is often underdiagnosed and untreated. An in-office, minimally invasive procedure addressing dynamic NVC uses a bioabsorbable implant (Latera) to support the lateral nasal wall. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the treatment in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with sham control.
Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, single-blinded RCT, 137 patients from 10 clinics were randomized into 2 arms: treatment arm (70 patients) and sham control arm (67 patients). Outcome measures were followed through 3 months after the procedure. The primary endpoint was the responder rate (percentage of patients with reduction in clinical severity by ≥1 category or ≥20% reduction in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation [NOSE] score).
Results: Before the procedure, there were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics and nasal obstruction symptom measures between the 2 arms. Three months after the procedure, responder rate was significantly higher for the treatment arm compared to the control (82.5% vs 54.7%, p = 0.001). Patients in the treatment arm also had a significantly greater decrease in NOSE score (-42.4 ± 23.4 vs -22.7 ± 27.9, p < 0.0001) and significantly lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (-39.0 ± 29.7 vs -13.3 ± 30.0, p < 0.0001) than the sham control arm. Seventeen patients reported 19 procedure/implant-related adverse events, all of which resolved with no clinical sequelae.
Conclusion: Our study shows the safety and effectiveness of the bioabsorbable implant in reducing patients' nasal obstruction symptoms.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2019.
- ASJ Commentary on: Functional/Aesthetic Measures of Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A ReviewEast C2019PMID 31145779
- ASJ Functional/Aesthetic Measures of Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A ReviewXiao H, Zhao Y, Liu L et al.2019PMID 30722008Summary
- APS Aesthetic Rhinoplasty and Nasal Obstruction: Presentation of Results of a 100-Patient Study by Using NOSE InventoryKotzampasakis D, Delistathi T, Kotzampasakis S et al.2019PMID 30706084Summary
- APS Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of sub mucosal Partial Inferior Turbinectomy and Out fracture of Inferior Turbinate in the Nasal Respiratory Function of Rhinoplasty PatientsOmranifard M, Adib M, Ebrahimpour Boroujeni S et al.2019PMID 31263933Summary
- APS Influence of the Subjective Body Image on the Outcome of Functional RhinoplastySpiekermann C, Beule AG, Rudack C et al.2019PMID 30264272Summary
- APS Role of Spreader Flaps in Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Patients Undergoing Correction for Severe Septal Deviation with Long-Term Follow-UpBarone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R et al.2019PMID 30868305Summary
- ANL A novel surgical technique: Crushed septal cartilage graft application in endonasal septoplastyMutlu V2019PMID 30126623Abstract
- BJO A new classification for septal perforation and effects of treatment methods on quality of lifeSapmaz E, Toplu Y, Somuk BT2019PMID 30057254Full text