Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2021
Evaluation of the relationship between patient expectation, patient expectation coverage rates and patient satisfaction in open primary septorhinoplasty surgery: a prospective randomized study
Avcu M, Metin M.
In the archive as a landmark paper: the core sweep runs 2011–2026, and this one is here because the history of rhinoplasty rests on it · cited on the consultation.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between preoperative patient expectation and postoperative patient expectation coverage rates and patient satisfaction.
Methods: 183 patients who underwent SRP for various reasons were divided into 6 groups according to surgical indication and the postoperative Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Scale (ROE). The groups were evaluated in terms of preoperative expectation levels and postoperative expectation coverage rate.
Results: When the patients were evaluated in terms of preoperative expectation levels, a significant difference was determined between the patients who underwent surgery for cosmetic reasons (86.15 ± 8.61) and those with functional reasons (79.24 ± 6.62) (p < 0.001). Similarly, the lowest patient expectation coverage rates were in the patient group with cosmetic reasons for the operation. When patients were grouped according to the ROE scores in the postoperative period and surgical indication, expectation was higher in the groups that were not satisfied with the results (Groups 2, 4 and 6). The highest expectation levels among the groups were seen in the dissatisfied patients who had undergone surgery for cosmetic reasons (92.17 ± 4.96). A strong positive correlation was found between expectation coverage rates and patient satisfaction (r 0.907, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Determination and rationalization of the expectations of patients in the preoperative period is one of the factors that will increase the satisfaction of the patients about the surgical procedure.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2021.
- ASJ Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the Dutch FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Questionnaires Using Rasch AnalysisDeclau F, Pingnet L, Verkest V et al.2021PMID 33945612Summary
- APS Awareness of Facial Asymmetry and Its Impact on Postoperative Satisfaction of Rhinoplasty PatientSözen T, Dizdar D, Göksel A2021PMID 32974739Summary
- APS Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Rhinoplasty Candidates: Prevalence and Functional Correlationsde Souza TSC, Patrial MTCRO, Meneguetti AFC et al.2021PMID 32875438Summary
- APS Evaluation of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes After Open Rhinoplasty: A Quasi-experimental Study by the Aid of ROE and RHINO QuestionnairesHaddady Abianeh S, Moradi Bajestani S, Rahmati J et al.2021PMID 32747985Summary
- APS 2021PMID 33811290Summary
- APS Invited Discussion on "Awareness of Facial Asymmetry and Its Impact on Postoperative Satisfaction of Rhinoplasty Patient"Lisiecki JL, Gilman RH2021PMID 33063160Summary
- APS 2021PMID 32974740
- APS 2021PMID 34075457Full text