Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2025
A Novel Classification of Nasal Sill Morphology Provides Strategies for Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty
Xia Y, Yuan J, Wang Z, Zhen Y, An Y.
What this paper says
From 276 secondary cleft nasolabial corrections at Peking University Third Hospital, the authors propose four types of nasal sill deformity seen from below, each with a matched surgical strategy; 59.78% were the most severe type IV.
Overview
Secondary cleft lip-nose deformities lack a standard classification, so surgeons rely on experience. The authors classified patients treated between August 2019 and July 2024 by the shape of the nasal sill on the base view and tailored surgery to each type.
Sections of note
- 276 patients.
- Type I 13 (4.71%), type II 25 (9.06%), type III 73 (26.45%), type IV 165 (59.78%).
- All patients were reported to have improved sill aesthetics and nasal symmetry.
- The authors present it as a first attempt at an objective standard for secondary cleft nasolabial surgery.
- Level of Evidence IV.
What it means for a patient
- The nostril floor and sill on the cleft side are a major source of visible asymmetry after cleft repair.
- A classification lets a surgeon explain which type you have and what operation matches it.
- Outcome claims are qualitative; no measurements or scores are given in the abstract.
Why this paper matters
It brings a structured classification to a large series in an area governed by surgeon preference. Limits: single centre, no quantified outcomes, no comparison of strategies.
Terms
- Nasal sill: the floor of the nostril opening where it meets the upper lip.
- Base view: the photograph taken from below the nose.
- Secondary cleft nasolabial deformity: residual lip and nose asymmetry after the original cleft repair.
- Nasolabial: relating to the nose and upper lip together.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows. All 1,262 summaries.
From the abstract
“Inconsistent and suboptimal outcomes in secondary cleft lip deformity repairs stem from the absence of a standardized classification system for nasolabial deformities, causing surgeons to rely heavily on their experience to determine surgical strategies. Nasal sill morphology reflects the severity of nasolabial…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Revision and secondary rhinoplasty
Between 5% and 15% of rhinoplasties are done again, and the published series say the second operation is a different problem from the first: the cartilage is gone, the skin is scarred and less able to survive, and the airway is usually part of the complaint.
Cleft, trauma and reconstruction
A cleft nose is a sequence spread across a childhood: a repair at three months, sometimes a second at five or six, and a definitive rhinoplasty once the face has finished growing.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
Before any technique is chosen, the nose has to be read: the bone measured, the cartilage counted, the skin assessed, and the result the patient wants agreed on a photograph that is not yet true.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Bridging the Gap in Rhinoplasty Training: The Effectiveness of 3D Printed Models in Surgical EducationRehman U, Polglase N, Kahn D et al.2025PMID 40129179Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ In-House Virtual Planning and 3D-Printed Surgical Guides for Reconstructive RhinoplastyRubio-Palau J, Gonçalves J, Malet-Contreras A et al.2025PMID 39161317Summary
- ASJ One Profile to Rule Them All? A Neural Network Analysis of the Homogenizing Effect of Primary RhinoplastyKhaw KL, Lu SM2025PMID 40501168Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- ASJ Single-Stage Alar Nostril Ring Correction Using Auricular Composite Grafts in Reconstructive RhinoplastySazgar AA, Sazgar AK, Hatami N et al.2025PMID 39676167Summary
- ASJ Strategic Use of the V-Shaped Columella-Labial Incision for Reconstructive Rhinoplasty in Severely Compromised NosesSazgar AA, Sazgar MA, Zarei R et al.2025PMID 40408098Summary
- ASJO A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Autologous vs Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts for Dorsal Augmentation RhinoplastyLiyanage D, Vayalapra S, Murdeshwar H et al.2025PMID 39896219Full text