Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Septum, valve and airway · Complications and management · 2025
Complications in Functional Rhinoplasty Related to Cartilage Graft Source
Upton MK, Ortiz A, Neal E, Lee D, Patel PN, Yang SF, Stephan SJ.
What this paper says
In 259 functional rhinoplasties, revision was needed in 12.1% of patients grafted with fresh-frozen donor rib versus 4.0% with the patient's own cartilage, a four-fold higher odds after adjustment, with no difference in infection.
Overview
Functional rhinoplasty often needs cartilage for structural grafts. The authors reviewed patients treated from 2017 to 2022 with at least 6 months of follow-up, comparing autologous cartilage against fresh-frozen cadaveric rib (FFCR) on revision, infection and persistent obstruction, using chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression.
Sections of note
- 259 patients, mean age 43.1, 71.4% female; mean follow-up 12.3 months (range 6-54).
- 58 (22.4%) received FFCR.
- Revision: 8 of 201 (4.0%) autologous versus 7 of 58 (12.1%) FFCR; overall 5.8%.
- Persistent obstruction without surgery 6.6%; infection needing antibiotics or drainage 4.6%.
- Logistic regression: FFCR associated with revision (p = 0.024, OR 4.0), not with infection (p = 0.101) or obstruction (p = 0.187).
What it means for a patient
- Donor rib avoids a chest incision but in this study was linked to three times the revision rate.
- Infection was not higher with donor cartilage.
- If your own cartilage is insufficient, the authors advise a tailored discussion of the trade-offs.
Why this paper matters
It is a direct comparison of graft sources in a functional (not cosmetic) population, and its finding conflicts with some single-surgeon series favouring donor rib. Limits: retrospective, unequal groups, and the reported confidence interval for the odds ratio is inconsistent in the abstract.
Terms
- Functional rhinoplasty: nasal surgery to improve breathing.
- Fresh-frozen cadaveric rib (FFCR): donor rib cartilage preserved by freezing.
- Autologous cartilage: the patient's own septal, ear or rib cartilage.
- Odds ratio (OR): the relative odds of an event; 4.0 means four times the odds.
- Multivariable logistic regression: a statistical method adjusting for several factors at once.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows. All 1,262 summaries.
From the abstract
“Functional rhinoplasty often relies on repurposed cartilage for nasal framework grafting. Objective: To compare complications in functional rhinoplasty associated with use of autologous versus fresh frozen cadaveric rib cartilage (FFCR). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Rib, ear and septal grafts
Modern rhinoplasty builds rather than removes, so the operation runs on cartilage: the septum first, then the ear, then the rib, and when none of those will do, a piece of donated rib from a tissue bank.
Septum, valve and airway
Every rhinoplasty is a breathing operation whether it intends to be or not: the septum holds the nose up as well as dividing it, and the narrowest part of the whole airway is the internal valve the surgeon is standing over.
Complications and management
Serious complications after rhinoplasty are rare: infection runs under 1% in the two largest single-surgeon series, pooled rib harvests record no pneumothorax, and the bleeding series record no thromboembolism.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Single-Stage Alar Nostril Ring Correction Using Auricular Composite Grafts in Reconstructive RhinoplastySazgar AA, Sazgar AK, Hatami N et al.2025PMID 39676167Summary
- ASJ Topical Tranexamic Acid and Systemic Dexamethasone for Post-rhinoplasty Edema and Ecchymosis: First Direct ComparisonVural O, Koycu A2025PMID 40343983Summary
- ASJO A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Autologous vs Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts for Dorsal Augmentation RhinoplastyLiyanage D, Vayalapra S, Murdeshwar H et al.2025PMID 39896219Full text
- APS Autologous Fat Injection for Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Satisfaction, Reinjection and Fat RetentionZeng H, Tang S2025PMID 39751904Summary
- APS Complications of Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty with Hyaluronic Acid Injections: A Narrative ReviewCaranti A, Thomas R, Facchini F et al.2025PMID 39747417Summary
- APS Conjoint Shield and Onlay Tip Graft, a Duo for Nasal Tip Camouflage and Refinement in RhinoplastyWu L, Wang H, Ma H et al.2025PMID 40195133Summary
- APS Correction: The Effectiveness of Bromelain on Oedema, Subconjunctival Haemorrhage, and Ecchymosis After Rhinoplasty: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled TrialRahmaty B, Naraghi M, Mesbahi A et al.2025PMID 39979672
- APS Double-Tunnel Creation in Mucoperichondrial-Mucoperiosteal Septal Flap to Preserve the Sagittal Stability of Dorsal Components in RhinoplastyRajaee A, Tajik N, Karimi-Galougahi M2025PMID 40195130Summary