Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · 2025
Extracorporeal Septoplasty for Severe Nasal Septal Deviation: A Systematic Review
Lazzeroni M, Lechien JR, Lentini M, Capaccio P, Saibene AM, Gaffuri M, Bulfamante AM, Locatello LG, Tancredi P, Angelo I, Sireci F, Maniaci A.
In the archive as a landmark paper: the core sweep runs 2011–2026, and this one is here because the history of rhinoplasty rests on it · cited on extracorporeal septoplasty.
Abstract
Objective: Extracorporeal septoplasty (ECS) is a surgical technique used to address severe nasal septal deviations, especially in patients in whom in situ septoplasty (ISS) is insufficient. This systematic review assesses the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of ECS techniques, including conventional and modified ECS methods.
Data Sources: PRISMA-compliant systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase.
Methods: Studies on ECS techniques were included. Eligibility criteria were established using the PICOTS framework. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Functional and aesthetic improvements were primary outcomes, while complication rates represented secondary outcomes.
Results: Twenty-two studies (retrospective, prospective, and RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. ECS was associated with significant functional improvement, as assessed by nasal obstruction scores measured by NOSE scores, acoustic rhinometry, and rhinomanometry. Aesthetic results were also satisfactory, with a significant improvement in the nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, and the tip projection index, as well as good patients' satisfaction. Complications were rare, with few cases of septal perforation, graft resorption, or residual nasal obstructive symptoms. Evidence strength was limited considering the majority of included studies were retrospective, with inherent bias risks, small sample sizes, and inconsistent follow-up durations.
Conclusions: ECS may be a successful and safe method for severe septal deviation correction, providing functional and aesthetic results with a low complication rate. More high-quality, multicenter RCTs with long-term follow-up will be required for a standardization of surgical protocols and outcome measures.
Level Of Evidence: 2.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- APS Double-Tunnel Creation in Mucoperichondrial-Mucoperiosteal Septal Flap to Preserve the Sagittal Stability of Dorsal Components in RhinoplastyRajaee A, Tajik N, Karimi-Galougahi M2025PMID 40195130Summary
- APS 2025PMID 40126620Full text
- APS Impact of Rhinoplasty on Nasal Breathing and Olfactory Function: A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort StudyObeid M, Obeid I, Adi M et al.2025PMID 39929985Summary
- APS The Impact of Scroll Ligament Preservation on Nasal Airway Patency in Rhinoplasty: An Objective Study with Rhinomanometry and Acoustic RhinometryAgdoğan Ö, Ersözlü T2025PMID 39227471Summary
- APS Tip Surgery in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: The Effect of Modified Low Septal Strip Septoplasty on Tip PlastyÇelik V, Tuluy Y, Çakır Bozkurt G2025PMID 38977457Summary
- APS Optimizing Nasal Tip Position: A Systematic Review of Columellar Strut and Septal Extension GraftsAmador RO, Hamaguchi R, Bartlett RA et al.2025PMID 40864612Abstract
- EAO Septoplasty versus non-surgical management for deviated nasal septum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsTaha HI, Elgendy MS, Ezz MR et al.2025PMID 39230606Full text
- FPS Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts in Complex Functional SeptorhinoplastyJama GM, Bhanwala S, Pericleous A et al.2025PMID 39824508Abstract