rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · 2026

BO BMJ Open · 2026

Cost-effectiveness of immediate septoplasty versus medical management with the option for delayed septoplasty for nasal airways obstruction: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Homer T, Carrie S, Fouweather T, Teare D, Waugh N, O'Hara J, Wilson JA, Ternent L.

In the archive as a landmark paper: the core sweep runs 2011–2026, and this one is here because the history of rhinoplasty rests on it · cited on septoplasty.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of immediate septoplasty compared with 6 months of medical management with the option for delayed septoplasty in individuals with nasal obstruction associated with septal deviation.

Design: Economic evaluation alongside a multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 17 otolaryngology clinics in the UK, recruiting from January 2018 to December 2019.

Participants: Adults aged≥18 years with symptoms of nasal obstruction associated with septal deviation with at least moderate symptoms of nasal obstruction (score>30 on the Nasal Obstruction and Symptom Evaluation scale).

Interventions: Participants were randomised to receive either septoplasty within 12 weeks of recruitment or 6 months of medical management (nasal steroid and saline spray) with the option for delayed septoplasty.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 12 months. A UK National Health Service perspective was adopted, and surgery costs were estimated using a tariff and micro-costing. QALYs were estimated based on responses to the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Seemingly unrelated regression was used to estimate incremental costs and QALYs. A model-based analysis was used to extrapolate costs and effects to 24 months. Sensitivity analyses were used to illustrate uncertainty.

Results: In the within-trial analysis, immediate septoplasty was on average more costly (mean difference (95% CI) £1193 (£1018 to £1368)) and more effective (mean difference (95% CI) 0.044 QALYs (0.03 to 0.06)) when compared with 6 months of medical management with the option for deferred septoplasty. Immediate septoplasty had an incremental cost per QALY gained of £27 114 in the base case analysis, which decreased to £16 682 when micro-costing was used to estimate surgery costs. Immediate septoplasty had a 15% and 78% probability of being considered cost-effective at a £20 000 threshold for an additional QALY, respectively. In the model-based analysis, immediate septoplasty remained more costly and more effective than 6 months of medical management with the option for deferred septoplasty but had a 99% probability of being considered cost-effective at a £20 000 threshold for an additional QALY.

Conclusions: Over a 24-month time horizon, immediate septoplasty would be cost-effective in the management of deviated nasal septum.

Study Registration: ISRCTN16168569.

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
BMJ Open
Year
2026
Authors
8
Type
Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Comparative Study
Access
Open access
On this site
Full abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2026.

  1. ASJ
    2026PMID 42415377Summary
  2. ASJ
    2026PMID 41990353Summary
  3. APS
    2026PMID 41145862Abstract
  4. APS
    2026PMID 41857160Summary
  5. APS
    2026PMID 40855022Summary
  6. APS
    2026PMID 41711880Full text
  7. APS
    2026PMID 41436885
  8. APS
    2026PMID 41345307Summary