Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · 2026
Cost-effectiveness of immediate septoplasty versus medical management with the option for delayed septoplasty for nasal airways obstruction: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
Homer T, Carrie S, Fouweather T, Teare D, Waugh N, O'Hara J, Wilson JA, Ternent L.
In the archive as a landmark paper: the core sweep runs 2011–2026, and this one is here because the history of rhinoplasty rests on it · cited on septoplasty.
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of immediate septoplasty compared with 6 months of medical management with the option for delayed septoplasty in individuals with nasal obstruction associated with septal deviation.
Design: Economic evaluation alongside a multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial.
Setting: 17 otolaryngology clinics in the UK, recruiting from January 2018 to December 2019.
Participants: Adults aged≥18 years with symptoms of nasal obstruction associated with septal deviation with at least moderate symptoms of nasal obstruction (score>30 on the Nasal Obstruction and Symptom Evaluation scale).
Interventions: Participants were randomised to receive either septoplasty within 12 weeks of recruitment or 6 months of medical management (nasal steroid and saline spray) with the option for delayed septoplasty.
Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 12 months. A UK National Health Service perspective was adopted, and surgery costs were estimated using a tariff and micro-costing. QALYs were estimated based on responses to the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Seemingly unrelated regression was used to estimate incremental costs and QALYs. A model-based analysis was used to extrapolate costs and effects to 24 months. Sensitivity analyses were used to illustrate uncertainty.
Results: In the within-trial analysis, immediate septoplasty was on average more costly (mean difference (95% CI) £1193 (£1018 to £1368)) and more effective (mean difference (95% CI) 0.044 QALYs (0.03 to 0.06)) when compared with 6 months of medical management with the option for deferred septoplasty. Immediate septoplasty had an incremental cost per QALY gained of £27 114 in the base case analysis, which decreased to £16 682 when micro-costing was used to estimate surgery costs. Immediate septoplasty had a 15% and 78% probability of being considered cost-effective at a £20 000 threshold for an additional QALY, respectively. In the model-based analysis, immediate septoplasty remained more costly and more effective than 6 months of medical management with the option for deferred septoplasty but had a 99% probability of being considered cost-effective at a £20 000 threshold for an additional QALY.
Conclusions: Over a 24-month time horizon, immediate septoplasty would be cost-effective in the management of deviated nasal septum.
Study Registration: ISRCTN16168569.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2026.
- ASJ Dorsal Width and Functional Outcomes with use of Autospreader Flaps in Cosmetic RhinoplastyJabbour N, Pelligrini W, Shehan J et al.2026PMID 42415377Summary
- ASJ Efficacy of Combined Septal Extension and Derotation Grafts in Asian Rhinoplasty: A Quantitative Analysis of Tip Projection and StabilityHuang CJ, Tsai TY, Yen CI et al.2026PMID 41990353Summary
- APS Aesthetic Septoplasty in Children with External Nasal Deformity: An Endonasal Modified Dorsum-Preserving Extracorporeal Septoplasty TechniqueGuliyev M, Erbek SS2026PMID 41145862Abstract
- APS Application and Efficacy Observation of Autologous Bilateral Auricular Cartilage Combined with Nasal Septal Cartilage in Nasal Tip Shaping During RhinoplastyWang L, Li X, Li Z et al.2026PMID 41857160Summary
- APS Combination of Paramedian Dorsal Component Excision and Low Septal Strip Septoplasty: A Hybrid Rhinoplasty Technique with Endonasal ApproachÇelik V, Parspancı A, Tuluy Y2026PMID 40855022Summary
- APS Comment on "Technical Report: Effectiveness of Facial Exercise Therapy and Facial Anthropometric Measurements in Recurrent Septal Deviation After Rhinoplasty"Eşme S, Kaya B, Bilecenoğlu B2026PMID 41711880Full text
- APS Comment on ''Technical Report: Effectiveness of Facial Exercise Therapy and Facial Anthropometric Measurements in Recurrent Septal Deviation After Rhinoplasty''Yücedağ Gündoğdu H, Paslı B2026PMID 41436885
- APS Evaluating the Role of Columellar Strut Grafts in the ERA of Septal Extension in Preservation RhinoplastyIshida LC, Daronch OT, Ouchi JK et al.2026PMID 41345307Summary