Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Open versus closed approach · 2022
In-office Endonasal Minor Revision Rhinoplasty
Auger SR, Shah AR.
What this paper says
A technique article outlining which isolated post rhinoplasty deformities can be corrected in the office through incisions inside the nose, avoiding general anesthesia and operating room cost.
Overview
Revision rhinoplasty presents distinct difficulties, and while many cases need a full operation in theatre, the authors state several isolated deformities can be repaired in the office through an endonasal approach. They list the stated benefits as reduced cost, shorter recovery, avoiding general anesthesia and less discomfort. The article outlines the deformities suited to this and the technical considerations for each.
Sections of note
- Technique article; the abstract reports no patient numbers, no outcomes, no complication rates and no follow up.
- The approach is endonasal, meaning all incisions are inside the nose.
- Stated benefits are decreased cost, shorter recovery time, avoidance of general anesthesia and less discomfort.
- The authors state it is critical to identify defects appropriate for endonasal repair.
- They also state the surgeon must establish clear expectations with the patient and work within their own skill and experience.
- Deformities suited to this repair are outlined along with technical considerations for each.
- The article is presented as a framework rather than a study.
What it means for a patient
- Some minor problems after rhinoplasty can be corrected under local anesthetic in a clinic rather than a full second operation.
- Which problems qualify depends on how isolated the defect is and on the surgeon's experience.
- No success rates, complication rates or patient numbers are reported.
- The authors state clear expectation setting is essential, which is a caution rather than a result.
Why this paper matters
Minor imperfections after rhinoplasty are common and a full revision under general anesthesia is a large step for a small problem. This article defines a middle option and the boundaries of it. Whether office repairs succeed as reliably as theatre revisions is not measured.
Terms
- Endonasal approach: surgery through incisions inside the nose only.
- Revision rhinoplasty: surgery on a nose that has already been operated on.
- In office procedure: a procedure done in a clinic under local anesthetic rather than in an operating room.
- General anesthesia: medication that renders a patient fully unconscious for surgery.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows. All 1,262 summaries.
From the abstract
“The revision rhinoplasty presents many unique challenges to the facial plastic surgeon. While many cases will require a full revision in the operating room, there are several isolated deformities which may be repaired in the office via an endonasal approach. This provides many benefits to the patient and surgeon…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Revision and secondary rhinoplasty
Between 5% and 15% of rhinoplasties are done again, and the published series say the second operation is a different problem from the first: the cartilage is gone, the skin is scarred and less able to survive, and the airway is usually part of the complaint.
Open versus closed approach
Whether the surgeon opens the nose through a small incision across the columella or works entirely through the nostrils has been argued in print since 1973, was put on facing pages of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery by Jack Gunter and Jack Sheen in 1997, and was finally pooled in 2025: across twenty studies and 1,067 patients there is no significant difference in what patients report, in breathing, in complications or in swelling.
Related papers
Same topic, 2022.
- ASJ Evolution of the Septal Extension Graft in Endonasal Rhinoplasty: Long-term Efficacy and ReliabilityHarel M, Shir-Az O, Berl A et al.2022PMID 35554489Summary
- APS A Modified Large-Cap Graft in East Asian Revision RhinoplastyZheng R, Dong W, Han R et al.2022PMID 35577970Summary
- APS Disussion: A Modified Large-cap Graft in East Asian Revision RhinoplastyLin SJ, Seyidova N2022PMID 35817877Full text
- APS 2022PMID 36323964
- APS Fine-Tuning of the Supratip in Rhinoplasty: An External ApproachKucukguven A, Konas E2022PMID 36042029Summary
- APS 2022PMID 34981155
- APS Publisher Correction: Fine-Tuning of the Supratip in Rhinoplasty: An External ApproachKucukguven A, Konas E2022PMID 36197466
- APS Re-Evaluating the Effect of Preoperative Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss and Field Quality During Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled TrialAfzali SL, Panahi H, Ganji F et al.2022PMID 34585263Summary